Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1988 (6) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Order per : K. Gopal Hegde, Member (J)].  - Appearing for the applicants Shri Patil submitted that the two orders passed by the Collector (Appeals) are prima facie bad. He contended that the Collector (Appeals) in his order had categorically stated that the two decisions of the Bombay High Court; one reported in 1987 (28) ELT 193 (BOM) and another reported in 1986 (25) ELT 966 (BOM) are in f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the goods have been used in the leather Industry. Therefore, Shri Mondal contended that the Collector (Appeals') order is correct. 3. We have considered the submissions made on both the sides prima facie. The show cause notice-cum-demand appears totally improper. The investigations appear to have been made by the department to the actual use or alleged mis-use of the imported goods. That apart....