https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73868 Existing Bombay High Court judgments were treated as binding because no stay by the High Court or Supreme Court was shown, and a mere statement that an appeal had been filed did not dilute their effect. On that basis, the demand was regarded as prima facie unsustainable, and the applicants were granted an unconditional stay of pre-deposit and recovery. The note therefore records that binding precedent, absent any stay, can justify complete interim protection where the underlying demand appears prima facie improper. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:47:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73868 Existing Bombay High Court judgments were treated as binding because no stay by the High Court or Supreme Court was shown, and a mere statement that an appeal had been filed did not dilute their effect. On that basis, the demand was regarded as prima facie unsustainable, and the applicants were granted an unconditional stay of pre-deposit and recovery. The note therefore records that binding precedent, absent any stay, can justify complete interim protection where the underlying demand appears prima facie improper. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73868