1987 (9) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondents. [Oral Judgment].  - In this petition, the petitioners are applying for liberty to withdraw the petition. Under normal circumstances, there would have been no further arguments. 2. However, Mr. Sethna has strenuously argued that the petitioners have made false statements on oath and an action should be taken against them for that purpose. 3. It is the submission of Mr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the goods have arrived at Kandla. The clearance of the said goods have wrongfully been withheld at Kandla. The petitioners are having their office at Bombay. The impact and the consequences of wrongful withholding of clearance by the respondents of the said goods at Bombay. The respondent No. 3 acts at the behest/guidance of Bombay authorities. In any view of the matter the part of cause of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Court had pointed out to Mr. Sethna that the petition which have been filed in the Court does not contain any mis-statement in this paragraph. It was also pointed out that the same Attorney had filed six identical petitions of which this was one. In the other five petitions, the averments in paragraph 30 are as were originally sent to the respondents. Under these circumstances, there is not the s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment that no other petition is pending either in this Court or in any other Court. He points out that in fact in respect of these very Bill of Entries, the petitioners had filed a petition in the Supreme Court which had been withdrawn and that there was no reference in this petition to those proceedings. Mr. Sethna also points out that the goods had arrived in Kandla, the Bill of Entry was filed i....