https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73468 The petitioners sought to withdraw their petition, but the respondents alleged false statements on oath and discrepancies in jurisdictional statements. Accusations of document tampering and failure to disclose a prior Supreme Court petition were made. Factual inconsistencies led to the court rejecting the petition and ordering the petitioners to pay costs to the respondents. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:14:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73468 The petitioners sought to withdraw their petition, but the respondents alleged false statements on oath and discrepancies in jurisdictional statements. Accusations of document tampering and failure to disclose a prior Supreme Court petition were made. Factual inconsistencies led to the court rejecting the petition and ordering the petitioners to pay costs to the respondents. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73468