Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1981 (11) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the trading account for the year under appeal. 2. The assessee derived income from business on sale of Motor spare parts and having a branch dealing in tyres. In respect of G.P. on motor spare parts etc., the trading results were accepted. But in respect of tyre account, the ITO did not accept the profit shown at 4.99 per cent as against 5.5 per cent disclosed last year by the assessee. The sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....are of the opinion that the assessee is entitled to succeed on this point. Admittedly, the difference of the G.P. shown during the year, under appeal and G.P. disclosed during the preceding year, was very nominal. The contention of the assessee that the commodities dealt in by it were essential commodities on which profits were restricted during the year in question remains uncontroverted. Having ....