<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 96 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67017</link>
    <description>The note discusses appellate treatment of income-tax adjustments where trading addition, motor car depreciation and interest, scooter depreciation and expenses, and shop expenses were found excessive on the facts. The tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s uncontroverted explanation that the tyre trading margin was nominal and deleted the trading addition. It also restricted allowance on motor car depreciation and bank interest to one-third, allowed scooter-related depreciation and expenses in full for business use, and reduced the shop-expense disallowance to the extent considered reasonable. The overall effect was substantial but partial relief to the assessee, based on the evidence and the quantum of each disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:37:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 96 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67017</link>
      <description>The note discusses appellate treatment of income-tax adjustments where trading addition, motor car depreciation and interest, scooter depreciation and expenses, and shop expenses were found excessive on the facts. The tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s uncontroverted explanation that the tyre trading margin was nominal and deleted the trading addition. It also restricted allowance on motor car depreciation and bank interest to one-third, allowed scooter-related depreciation and expenses in full for business use, and reduced the shop-expense disallowance to the extent considered reasonable. The overall effect was substantial but partial relief to the assessee, based on the evidence and the quantum of each disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>