Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (2) TMI 280

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t CIT(A)'s order, dt.16th Jan., 1992, relating to asst. yr. 1989-90. The assessee has challenged the partial confirmation of penalty under s. 271(1)(c) whereas the Revenue has challenged the relief granted by the CIT(A). 2. For the assessment year in question the assessee filed its return of income showing loss of Rs. 2.36 crores and the assessment was completed at a loss of Rs. 1.21 crores. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for concealment of income under s. 271(1)(c) is leviable. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the Department and this fact has been conceded by the learned Departmental Representative who has simply prayed that reference to the decision of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of P.R. Basappa & Sons vs. CIT (2000) 159 CTR (Kar) 198 : (2000) 243 ITR 776 (Kar) may be made....