<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 280 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63584</link>
    <description>Where the return disclosed a loss and the assessment only reduced that loss, concealment penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not to apply because both figures remained within the field of loss. The penalty sustained by the first appellate authority was therefore cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:31:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 280 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63584</link>
      <description>Where the return disclosed a loss and the assessment only reduced that loss, concealment penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not to apply because both figures remained within the field of loss. The penalty sustained by the first appellate authority was therefore cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>