Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (6) TMI 164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n technicians, are directed against separate orders of CIT(A). The assessment year involved in all the cases is 1993-94. Since common issues are involved for adjudication, all the appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order for the sake of convenience. 2. First ground raised and common in all the appeals reads as under: "That the learned CIT(A) has erred in mainta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ies below on the issue in question are set aside and the addition made and sustained on account of perquisite value of boarding is directed to be deleted. 4. Next common ground raised in ITA Nos. 1927, 1944, 1945 and 1946/Del/1997 reads as under: "That the learned CIT(A) has erred in maintaining the order of ITO regarding multiple grossing up of tax perquisite." 5. Learned counsel at the ....