Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the value of boarding provided to foreign technicians was taxable as a perquisite or as income from other sources. (ii) Whether there was scope for grossing up of tax perquisite in the assessees' cases.
Issue (i): Whether the value of boarding provided to foreign technicians was taxable as a perquisite or as income from other sources.
Analysis: The accommodation was found to be provided ex necessitate for discharge of the duties assigned. On that basis, it could not be treated as a perquisite and no addition was warranted on that account.
Conclusion: The addition on account of the perquisite value of boarding was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether there was scope for grossing up of tax perquisite in the assessees' cases.
Analysis: On similar facts, the Tribunal had consistently held that there was no scope for grossing up. Following that line of authority, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's stand.
Conclusion: There was no scope for grossing up of tax perquisite, and the ground was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The common issues were decided in favour of the assessees, and the appeals succeeded in full.
Ratio Decidendi: Accommodation provided as a necessity for performance of duties is not a taxable perquisite, and where no legal basis exists for grossing up, tax perquisite cannot be enhanced by that method.