Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Amendment Adds Tiruchirapalli to Notification for Mineral Oil Product Transfers Between Warehouses Under Rule 49 and 139</h1> Notification No. 28/97-C.E. (N.T.), dated August 1, 1997, amends Notification No. 266/67-Central Excises, originally issued on November 28, 1967. This amendment, made under sub-rule (2) of rule 49 and rule 139 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, involves the addition of a new item in paragraph 2, clause (i) of the original notification. The new entry, identified as '(zzza),' includes Tiruchirapalli in the Tiruchirapalli Perumbidugu Mutharaiyar District of Tamil Nadu, allowing for the removal of mineral oil products from one warehouse to another under Chapter VII.