Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      News
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      News

      Back

      All News

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        News

        Back

        All News

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Corp. Laws / SEBI / IBC

        Close proceedings against Sandesara brothers or we will pass orders: SC to SEBI

        April 2, 2026

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        New Delhi, Apr 2 (PTI) The Supreme Court told market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on Thursday to close proceedings against Sterling Biotech Limited (SBL) and its promoters, Chetan and Nitin Sandesara, or else it will be compelled to take a serious view of the matter.

        A bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and A S Chandurkar told the SEBI's counsel that its order of November last year was very clear that all proceedings against the Sandesara brothers will be quashed if they deposit Rs 5,100 crore in the apex court registry.

        "We have said all proceedings, including that of SEBI, need to be quashed upon deposit of the money. If you are doing it, then it is alright, or we will be compelled to pass a detailed order on the issue," the bench told the counsel.

        The SEBI's counsel said Solicitor General Tushar Mehta is deliberating with the market regulator and sought a week's time to apprise the court of the developments.

        Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing in the court for the Sandesara brothers, said the SEBI has till now refused to close the proceedings and that it has to take a call on the issue of quashing the proceedings in compliance with the apex court's order.

        The bench posted the matter for further hearing on April 10 and noted that Mehta, who is in deliberation with the SEBI on the issue, will apprise the court of the developments on the next day of hearing.

        The SEBI is probing allegations that the promoters of SBL had secured loans from foreign banks and routed funds into the company as purported investments that could mislead investors and distort the true financial position of the company.

        On November 19 last year, the top court accepted a settlement proposal under which the Sandesara brothers agreed to deposit Rs 5,100 crore as a full-and-final settlement of claims arising from these proceedings.

        The amount was deposited in the court registry in December 2025, following which the court gave effect to its earlier order for quashing of proceedings.

        Last month, a consortium of secured lenders, including banks of the SBL of promoters Chetan and Nitin Sandesara, moved the top court for the disbursal of their claim amounts from the Rs 5,100 crore deposited in the apex court registry, while highlighting that their total outstanding against the business group's companies was Rs 19,283.77 crore.

        The banks, which are 20 in number of the 26 secured creditors of the SBL, placed on record a consolidated computation of claims across multiple group entities and setting out the methodology adopted for the distribution of the amount.

        The application of the consortium, however, stated that a few lenders are yet to formally confirm their acceptance, although their dues have been computed on the same basis.

        On March 25, the bench noted that the total lender banks are 26 in number and out of the said list of banks, serial numbers one to 20 have submitted their claims and all relevant documents proportionate to their respective shares that have been specified in the chart.

        It noted that six banks have not submitted the formal affidavit and required documents, including Krung Thai Bank Public Company Limited (Singapore), Hua Nan Commercial Bank (Singapore), Taiwan Co-operative Bank, The Shanghai Commercial and Savings Bank Limited, HDFC Bank and Aviral Maritime Infra.

        "Thus, retaining the share with respect to their claims, the amount of the banks at Serial Nos. 1 to 20 be released immediately in terms of column 5 of Annexure A-4," the bench had said, adding that the interest accrued on the deposit lying with the bank with respect to the sum of the lender banks at serial numbers one to 20 be also proportionately distributed to them in accordance with the share of their claims.

        It had further said that the amount with respect to the banks at serial numbers 21 to 26, which is retained, shall be kept in fixed deposit on an auto-renewal basis separately and distributed on the submission of their claims.

        "The interest accrued on the sum of the remaining six banks be also kept in fixed deposit, in addition to the amount of their proportionate share," it had said.

        On the SEBI's proceedings against the Sandesara brothers, the top court on March 23 said the solicitor general may seek instructions on the issue and also on the closing of every other issue.

        The banks had earlier told the court that the lenders had decided to aggregate all domestic and foreign currency exposures, convert foreign loans into rupees at a fixed exchange rate of Rs 63 per US dollar -- reflecting the average rate in 2015, when most accounts turned non-performing -- and apply a uniform interest rate of 9 per cent per annum from the date of NPA, with annual rests.

        The banks had further told the court that after applying this methodology, the total admitted dues across all accounts were computed at Rs 19,283.77 crore and the amount of Rs 5,100 crore deposited pursuant to the court's earlier order was proposed to be distributed proportionately based on each lender's share in the total dues.

        The legal dispute arose from a batch of petitions filed by the Sandesara brothers seeking the quashing of multiple proceedings, including FIRs registered by the CBI, ED, and cases registered under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, Companies Act and Black Money Act. PTI MNL RC

        Settlement-linked quashing of proceedings keeps SEBI closure issue alive for Sterling Biotech and the Sandesara brothers. Settlement-linked quashing of proceedings concerning Sterling Biotech Limited and the Sandesara brothers remained under consideration, with the Supreme Court indicating that SEBI must close its proceedings in view of the earlier order under which deposit of the settlement amount was to trigger quashing of all proceedings. The Court recorded that the amount had already been deposited in the registry and that the earlier order had been given effect to, while SEBI sought time after internal deliberations on the closure issue.
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                Settlement-linked quashing of proceedings keeps SEBI closure issue alive for Sterling Biotech and the Sandesara brothers.

                                Settlement-linked quashing of proceedings concerning Sterling Biotech Limited and the Sandesara brothers remained under consideration, with the Supreme Court indicating that SEBI must close its proceedings in view of the earlier order under which deposit of the settlement amount was to trigger quashing of all proceedings. The Court recorded that the amount had already been deposited in the registry and that the earlier order had been given effect to, while SEBI sought time after internal deliberations on the closure issue.





                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found