Washington, Mar 17 (AP) Jay Allen is a fan of President Donald Trump, and voted for him on the belief that the Republican would cut taxes and trim regulations, helping his manufacturing business in northeast Arkansas.

But the tariffs at the core of Trump's economic agenda have wreaked havoc on his company, Allen Engineering Corp., which makes industrial equipment used to install, finish and pave concrete. The import taxes have raised the costs of engines, steel, gearboxes and clutches made abroad that Allen needs to build power trowels that can sell for up to USD 100,000 each.

Allen's experience embodies a growing body of evidence that the tariffs that Trump said would help American factories are, in fact, squashing many of them.

The problem could get worse as the administration scrambles to craft new tariffs to replace the emergency import taxes that the Supreme Court ruled illegal in February.

Allen said he ran his company at a loss in 2025 because of tariffs. His payroll has fallen to 140 workers from a peak of 205. To get by this year, he has hiked prices by 8 per cent to 10 per cent, even though that might mean fewer sales.

“What's really sad is the unintended consequences of his tariffs are hurting manufacturing in our country,” said Allen. “Unfortunately, the working-class people are getting squeezed.” Manufacturing jobs have declined during Trump's first year back Trump's core rationale for tariffs has been that they would force more factories to open in the US and would generate enough revenue to close federal budget deficits. But that hasn't materialized.

Factories continue to shed workers, with 98,000 manufacturing jobs lost during Trump's first full 12 months back in the White House. American companies that foot the bill for tariffs are now suing the Trump administration for more than $130 billion in tariff refunds. Meanwhile, the federal deficit is projected to climb over the next decade.

The White House maintains that construction spending is high, more workers are being hired to build factories, new investments are being made and labour productivity in manufacturing is increasing — which could eventually fuel a factory revival.

“It takes time to get production online, and therefore it will be some more time before we fully materialise the benefits of the president's policies,” Pierre Yared, the acting chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said in an email.

Construction is up — but that's due to Biden's bill Some of the bright spots in construction cited by the White House appear to be the result of programmes launched by then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

Factory construction spending began to accelerate in 2022 with the anticipation of government support from Biden's CHIPS and Science Act, which included big subsidies for computer chip plants. The law was a primary contributor to a historic surge in the annualised rate of construction spending on manufacturing facilities, said Skanda Amarnath, executive director of the economic policy group Employ America.

Construction spending on factories has slipped during Trump's presidency, but the pace remains relatively high largely because of continuing work on Biden-era projects in Arizona, Texas and Idaho, Amarnath said.

Amarnath has also gone through the interviews regional Federal Reserve banks have held with businesses. Those comments show some companies might expand by taking advantage of Trump's tax breaks on investments in equipment and new buildings.

But while the pharmaceutical drug sector might be expanding, the comments show no overall uptick in manufacturing because of Trump's tariffs.

“You don't get the sense that there is this new manufacturing renaissance underway,” Amarnath said.

Uncertainty in tariffs has deterred investments Based on orders, proclamations and other statements, Trump has taken more than 50 actions on tariffs so far — and that tally doesn't include the tariff threats he regularly makes on social media or in conversations with reporters but hasn't formally put in place.

The flurry of announcements, reversals, exemptions and legal challenges — as well as Trump's decision to bypass Congress to impose tariffs — has made it difficult for smaller manufacturing companies to plan.

For example, Allen Engineering imports its 75-horsepower diesel engines from Germany. Building them in the United States would require a USD 20 million investment — a huge risk if the status of the tariffs is unclear.

Are engine-makers “going to spend that kind of money to move production from Germany to the US when they don't know what the landscape is going to be in three years?” Allen said. “I don't know who is going to be in the White House, and what the stance is going to be on these tariffs.” Joseph Steinberg, an economist at the University of Toronto, said research shows that under the best-case scenario “it would take a decade for manufacturing employment to rise above where it was before tariffs were enacted.” But Steinberg said “the current situation is nothing like the best case”, since US trade policy is unsettled and that leaves companies reluctant to expand.

Equipment makers have been hit hard by rising steel costs About 98 per cent of US manufacturing establishments have fewer than 200 workers, according to Census Bureau data, and don't have the kind of name-brand recognition or lobbying heft to minimise the damage from tariffs that big players like Apple, General Motors and Ford possess.

The Association of Equipment Manufacturers in February reported that America's share of global manufacturing severely lags China's. The group has urged tax credits to offset the expense of tariffs, and specifically called for tariff relief on raw materials, parts and components that cannot be acquired domestically at scale.

Steel tariffs have been a particular concern. Trump imposed them last March and hiked them to 50 per cent in June. They were not affected by the Supreme Court decision.

Trump has credited the tariffs with restoring profits at American steel mills. But they have hurt companies that use that steel, like Calder Brothers in South Carolina, which makes equipment to pave asphalt.

“The steel tariffs were the first thing that got my attention,” said Glen Calder, the company's president. “My steel pricing jumped 25 per cent two weeks before the tariffs went into effect for domestic steel. The market price just jumped. It has stayed elevated.” Meanwhile, China's trade surplus has grown Part of Trump's push to expand manufacturing was to help American companies compete against China — a country he plans to visit this spring for talks with its leader, Xi Jinping.

But the US manufacturing trade imbalance rose last year under Trump instead of narrowing. Meanwhile, China's trade surplus with the world climbed to a record USD 1.2 trillion.

This trend exposes one of the big problems with Trump's tariff strategy, said Lori Wallach, director of the Rethink Trade program at American Economic Liberties Project. She noted that he largely bypassed Congress and failed to address gaps in the World Trade Organisation's rules for the trade frameworks that he negotiated with other countries.

Instead of working with partners to ensure there were penalties for foreign manufacturers with abusive labour practices and unfair subsidies, Trump chose against rallying partners to counter China as a unified group. American manufacturers are at a disadvantage, Wallach argued, because there is not a coalition of nations that can impose penalties for currency manipulation, subsidies and schemes to evade tariffs.

“The general revulsion of this administration to international cooperation means they're trying to do it alone,” Wallach said. (AP) PY PY

Tariff policy uncertainty driving higher input costs and deterring investment, worsening supply chain disruptions for manufacturers. Tariff measures enacted and announced by the executive have raised input costs for many US manufacturers, producing supply chain disruption, higher downstream prices, and employment contraction among small and medium producers. Uncertainty from frequent proclamations, reversals, exemptions and litigation has deterred capital investment and relocation decisions. While some construction and sectoral gains are cited by the administration, those reflect earlier subsidy driven projects rather than a broad manufacturing revival attributable to tariffs, and stakeholders call for targeted relief and clearer, coordinated trade strategies.