1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>India trade agreements criticized; leader defends palm oil imports and questions opacity and commitments in the India-US trade deal.</h1> Anand Sharma demands an apology for the Commerce Minister's criticisms of past trade pacts, defending palm oil imports as necessary and persistent across governments. He questions why CEPAs and bilateral trade agreements with regional partners were not cancelled if against national interest, and presses seven questions about the India-US trade arrangement, alleging opacity and potential commitments on agricultural and dairy market access that could affect sovereignty and multilateral trade obligations.