Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Budget allocations to a poll-bound state criticised as politically withheld; official data disputes claim and quantifies transfers.</h1> A state government alleges that the central government withheld customary election-period budget allocations to the poll-bound state, asserting political discrimination and reduced infrastructure funding; this allegation, if accepted, implies contested executive discretion over intergovernmental resource allocation and potential impact on state development. The central information office contests that claim, reporting increased central transfers with tax devolution of Rs 58,021 crore for FY 2026-27 and grants-in-aid of Rs 23,834 crore for 2025-26, indicating aggregate fiscal support. The state also reports extensive direct welfare delivery through mobile camps, completing 10,000 camps and finalising 38.44 lakh citizen representations.