1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Cab drivers protest alleged differential treatment and low earnings at Uber driver centre; company denies discrimination and cites subscription model.</h1> Allegations arose that the company engaged in differential treatment between fleet and independent drivers and that out of state recruitment reduced local drivers' earnings; a driver protest at the firm's driver centre escalated into an attempted forcible entry requiring police intervention. The company publicly denied discriminatory practices, affirmed policies of fairness and equal opportunity, and described a zero commission subscription model under which drivers retain fares after a nominal fee.