New Delhi, Jul 30 (PTI) Terming the trial involving former Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji a "rudderless ship", the Supreme Court on Wednesday said a cricket stadium will be needed to conduct prosecution in the cash-for-job scam related cases where over 2,000 persons have been implicated as accused.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, which pulled up the Tamil Nadu government for implicating so many persons as accused, questioned whether they are victims or victimisers and asked for the details of the accused and witnesses.

"We want to know from you clearly and definitely what is your prosecution plan. At present, it seems to be a rudderless ship. What would you achieve by clubbing the cases until and unless we gave a suggestion that you see the witnesses with regards to their degree of marginal culpability and prime culpability? Why should the suggestion come from us? Why did this thought never cross your prosecutor's mind.

"We are not making any comments. These are tentative observations to enable you to enlighten us on the prosecution plan. Tell us within what time you can finish the trial," the bench said.

The bench said it appears to be the most populated trial of India with 2,000 accused and 500 witnesses and a small courtroom would not suffice.

"With over 2,000 accused and 500 witnesses it will be the most populated trial of India. A small courtroom of the trial court will not suffice and a cricket stadium will be needed to even mark the presence of the accused. Several Artificial Intelligence-generated accused will pop up to mark their presence," the bench told senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for Y Balaji, who is representing victims of the scam and opposing the decision for clubbing of the cases.

The top court was hearing a petition filed by Y Balaji, challenging the March 28 Madras High Court order dismissing pleas against the clubbing of multiple chargesheets in cases related to the alleged scam.

The bench told Abhishek Singhvi, who is appearing for the Tamil Nadu government, "Let's be frank and blunt. A reluctant state wanted to give a decent burial to these cases. A friendly match was played before the high court and FIRs were quashed. Had it not been for judicial intervention by this court, these cases would not have been revived".

The top court said besides the ex-minister and officials who are prime accused, the other 2,000 persons arrayed as accused technically have committed a crime by giving bribe but on a comparative analysis they are more of a victim than an accused.

"They are more of a victim, than the victimisers. Giving bribes is a crime under the law. These poor people probably were coerced into giving bribes for a job of their son or relative. So prosecuting them would cause extreme inordinate delay. They can be treated more as prosecution witnesses rather than criminals. So the only way forward is we know who these people are," the top court said as it posted the matter for further hearing on August 11.

The bench observed that the trial court judge's report of April 25 submitted in the court appears to be correct that clubbing of cases arising from the same transaction was the only way out as there will be hundreds of same witnesses in different cases.

Sankaranarayanan while seeking appointment of a special public prosecutor, agreed that the best approach is to see who are the genuine accused such as the minister, his brother, his PA and the other people around him who solicited the bribe, they are the prime accused.

Justice Kant told Sankaranarayanan that he can submit a panel of names of good criminal lawyers practicing in Tamil Nadu and the court can think of appointing them.

Singhvi, however, opposed the suggestion and said that the prayer for appointment of special public prosecutor has been rejected time and again by this court and the petitioner Y Balaji is actually seeking review of those decisions without filing a review petition.

The bench said, "He (Senthil Balaji) is a powerful politician. Nothing wrong with being a powerful politician. He is somebody who has public support. But our only concern is that in a case where some person who has held a position of the minister is an accused, where some bureaucrats or other affluent people are facing trial in such cases generally there is a public perception that the prosecution through the government appointed public prosecutor may not alone be able to do justice." Justice Kant said there can be a public prosecutor who is not from Tamil Nadu and the only motive of the exercise is to bring the prime accused before the law.

On Tuesday, the top court expressed displeasure over the state "attempting to delay" the trial in cases involving Senthil Balaji by implicating more than 2,000 people as accused in the alleged cash-for-jobs scam and described the attempt as a "complete fraud on the judicial system".

Balaji resigned from the M K Stalin-led state Cabinet on April 27 after being pulled up by the top court.

The apex court asked Balaji on April 23 to make a choice "between post and freedom" as it warned him that his bail would be cancelled if he did not step down as a minister.

It took exception to the fact that Balaji was reinstated as a minister in the southern state, days after he obtained bail in a money-laundering case related to the alleged cash-for-jobs scam.

On September 26, 2024, the top court granted bail to Balaji in a case probed by the Enforcement Directorate.

With Balaji spending more than 15 months in jail, the top court had observed that there was no possibility that the trial would be concluded in the near future. PTI MNL GSN MNL GSN GSN