https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51004 Supreme Court reprimanded the prosecution for mass-implicating persons in the alleged cash-for-jobs cases and demanded a clear, time-bound prosecution plan. The court required identification of accused and witnesses and directed differentiation between prime culpability (principal solicitors and beneficiaries) and marginal or coerced actors who may serve as witnesses. It recognised case-consolidation where transactions and witnesses overlap but insisted consolidation be accompanied by a targeted prosecution strategy and consideration of appointing an independent public prosecutor to ensure impartial trial management. en-us Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:01:04 +0530 Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:01:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51004 Supreme Court reprimanded the prosecution for mass-implicating persons in the alleged cash-for-jobs cases and demanded a clear, time-bound prosecution plan. The court required identification of accused and witnesses and directed differentiation between prime culpability (principal solicitors and beneficiaries) and marginal or coerced actors who may serve as witnesses. It recognised case-consolidation where transactions and witnesses overlap but insisted consolidation be accompanied by a targeted prosecution strategy and consideration of appointing an independent public prosecutor to ensure impartial trial management. News - Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:01:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=51004