1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Ministry Debunks Claims of Profiteering by Fertilizer Firms Under NBS Policy; Emphasizes Transparency and Market-Based Pricing.</h1> Reports suggesting undue profits by fertilizer companies under the Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) Policy are deemed incorrect by the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers. The ministry clarifies that the subsidy is fixed annually, allowing companies to set their own maximum retail prices based on international prices and costs. There is no evidence of profiteering, as company balance sheets are publicly accessible. The reported excess import of fertilizers in early 2012 was aligned with agricultural needs, ensuring no shortages during peak seasons. The NBS Policy aims to stabilize prices and availability, with no regulation on company-set prices.