Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Mumbai, Feb 20 (PTI) Skoda Auto Volkswagen India will have to fall in line and not play "victim", the Customs department told the Bombay High Court on Thursday, justifying its USD 1.4 billion tax demand notice served on the firm for allegedly providing misleading information on imports.
Additional Solicitor General N Venkatraman, appearing for the Customs department before a division bench of Justices B P Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla, noted the rule of law is the same for everyone and that the authority was not in fault for issuing the tax demand notice.
"You have to follow the law. You have to fall in line. The rule of law is the same for everyone. Similar importers are already paying 30 per cent. It is not our fault for issuing this show cause notice," he said in his arguments before a division bench of Justices B P Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla.
Venkatraman maintained it was the German car maker's fault to not classify the import items properly.
"It is the company's fault for not classifying the items properly. Don't be the victim here. If you don't follow the law then we will initiate action in accordance with the provisions of law," the Additional Solicitor General asserted.
The division bench was hearing a petition filed by the automaker last month, in which it challenged the notice, terming it as "arbitrary and illegal". PTI SP RSY
Tax demand notice enforcement against importer over alleged misclassification prompts legal challenge and scrutiny of procedural compliance. A revenue authority issued a tax demand notice against an importer for allegedly providing misleading import information and incorrect tariff classification, asserting lawful entitlement to recover duties and initiate statutory proceedings; the importer has challenged the notice as arbitrary and illegal, raising issues of procedural compliance, correctness of classification, and uniformity of enforcement practices.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.