1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Use of restraints in deportation prompts parliamentary scrutiny and questions about diplomatic engagement and repatriation efforts.</h1> Parliamentary debate centres on the use of restraints under the US standard operating procedure for deportation since 2012, questioning whether the External Affairs Minister raised or protested the SOP in discussions with US officials and whether India offered repatriation flights; the government replied that the SOP originates with US authorities, excludes restraining women and children, and that diplomatic engagement continues to prevent mistreatment while addressing illegal migration enforcement.