Advanced Search Options : ❯
Section 84C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 84C establishes liability for attempts to commit offences punishable under the Information Technology Act, 2000, and for causing such offences to be committed. Where no express punishment is prescribed for an attempt involving an act towards commission, punishment may include imprisonment up to one-half of the maximum term applicable to the substantive offence, the applicable fine, or both.
Section 84B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Abetment of an offence under the Information Technology Act, 2000 attracts the punishment prescribed for the underlying offence when the abetted act is committed as a consequence of abetment and no separate express punishment applies. Such consequence may arise through instigation, conspiracy, or aid constituting abetment.
Section 84A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 84A authorises the Central Government to prescribe modes or methods for encryption for secure use of the electronic medium. The power may be exercised to promote e-governance and e-commerce, placing encryption methods within a framework for electronic security and connecting secure electronic use with electronic governmental functions and commercial transactions through such prescribed methods.
Section 84 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Good-faith immunity protects against suits, prosecutions and other legal proceedings for acts done or intended to be done pursuant to the Information Technology Act, 2000, or its rules, regulations or orders. It extends to the Central Government, State Governments, the Controller, persons acting on the Controller's behalf, and adjudicating officers.
Section 83 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 83 authorises the Central Government to issue directions to any State Government for carrying out within that State any provision of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and any rule, regulation or order made under it. This intergovernmental implementation mechanism concerns execution of the statutory framework and its subordinate instruments at the State level.
Section 82 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 82 deems the Controller, Deputy Controller and Assistant Controllers to be public servants within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code provision defining public servants. The provision was amended in 2008 and 2017; the earlier formulation also covered the Chairperson, Members, officers and employees of the Cyber Appellate Tribunal.
Section 81A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 81A applies the Information Technology Act, 2000 to electronic cheques and truncated cheques. The Central Government may, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, make necessary adaptations through Official Gazette notification for the purposes of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Such notifications are subject to parliamentary laying, modification or annulment, without invalidating prior actions. The expressions electronic cheque and truncated cheque have the meanings assigned under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Section 81 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 81 gives the Information Technology Act, 2000 overriding effect over inconsistent provisions of other laws in force. This priority is subject to an express safeguard: nothing under that Act restricts a person's exercise of rights conferred by the Copyright Act, 1957, or the Patents Act, 1970. Copyright and patent rights remain exercisable despite the Act's general precedence.
Section 80 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 80 permits police officers of at least Inspector rank and specified authorised government officers to enter public places, search, and arrest without warrant on reasonable suspicion of an Information Technology Act offence. Public places include public conveyances, hotels, shops, and other publicly accessible locations. A non-police officer making an arrest must promptly produce the person before the competent magistrate or police station officer. Criminal Procedure Code provisions apply subject to this power.
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 24-9-2026
PTI
IRDAI's consultation proposals for insurance distribution contemplate lower Expenses of Management limits, tighter commission controls, and greater control over loan-linked insurance practices. The prospective framework concerns insurer and intermediary remuneration, distribution expenses, and bancassurance fee structures. Reported concerns centre on potential effects on insurer earnings, intermediary economics, and lending-linked distribution arrangements; the measures are not described as final operative obligations or enforcement action.
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 24-9-2026
PTI
Eligible customers may seek collateral-free personal loans within stated amount, tenure and interest-rate ranges. Loan amount, interest rate and tenure determine the EMI and total interest payable, while calculator results are estimates rather than final repayment obligations. Eligibility includes nationality, age, employment and credit-score conditions, but approval, final pricing and loan amount remain subject to lender assessment, document verification and applicable terms. Online applications require personal, financial and employment details and KYC verification.
Section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 79A empowers the Central Government to designate, by Official Gazette notification, a Department, body or agency of the Central or State Government as an Examiner of Electronic Evidence for providing expert opinions before courts or other authorities. Electronic form evidence includes probative information stored or transmitted electronically, including computer evidence, digital audio, digital video, cell phones and digital fax machines.
Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Intermediary safe-harbour protects against liability for third-party information where the intermediary provides access to a communication system or remains neutral in transmission, recipient selection, and content. Protection requires due diligence and compliance with prescribed guidelines. It does not apply where the intermediary participates in an unlawful act or, after actual knowledge or appropriate Government notification, fails to expeditiously remove or disable access to unlawful material without vitiating evidence.
Section 77B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 77B classifies offences punishable with imprisonment of three years or more as cognizable, notwithstanding inconsistent criminal-procedure provisions. Offences punishable with imprisonment of exactly three years are bailable; consequently, that category is both cognizable and bailable. This classification was inserted through the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and took effect on 27 October 2009.
Section 77A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Compounding under the Information Technology Act, 2000 is confined to offences not punishable with life imprisonment or imprisonment exceeding three years. It is unavailable where a prior conviction exposes the accused to enhanced or different punishment, or where the offence affects socioeconomic conditions or is committed against a child below eighteen years or a woman. An accused may apply in the court where trial is pending, following the specified plea-bargaining procedure.
Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
Dated:- 24-9-2026
Each company seeking to function as a Nidhi must file Form NDH-4 for declaration or updated Nidhi status and comply with the Companies Act, 2013 and applicable Nidhi Rules. Nidhi companies may accept deposits and grant loans only to members. Public investors should verify declared Nidhi status rather than rely on unusually high-return promises, agent representations, or informal assurances. Deposits with Nidhi companies are not insured by the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation, and recovery may be difficult where a company fails or fraud occurs.
Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Disclosure of personal information obtained while providing services under a lawful contract attracts liability where it is made to another person without consent or in breach of the contract, with intent or knowledge of likely wrongful loss or wrongful gain. The penalty may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees. From 30 November 2023, the earlier criminal punishment was replaced by a penalty.
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 24-9-2026
PTI
Banks retain full discretion to deploy liquidity mobilised through FCNR(B) deposits, based on their credit pipeline, lending proposals, liquidity outlook and asset-liability position. No sector-specific direction applies to use of these funds. FCNR(B) deposits are fixed-term foreign-currency deposits in which principal and interest are repayable in the same foreign currency, protecting non-resident depositors from direct rupee exchange-rate risk. Continued prudent credit appraisal and underwriting standards are expected.
Circular No. 42/2026 Dated:- 24-9-2026 Circular Dated:- 24-9-2026 Circular
Specified woven and knitted fabric tariff items under Chapters 52, 55 and 60 require mandatory additional qualifiers in electronic export declarations from 1 November 2026. Exporters must use the qualifier "CHR" and declare either "FR001 - Flame Retardant Fabric" or "FR009 - Other than Flame Retardant Fabric" while filing shipping bills in the Customs Automated System. The requirement distinguishes fabrics used in fire/flame-retardant textile products from other fabrics sharing the same tariff classifications and supports implementation of the Production Linked Incentive Scheme for Textiles.
Section 70B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 - Indian Laws - Acts
Section 70B establishes the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team as the national agency for cyber-incident response, including information collection, alerts, emergency measures, coordination, and information-security guidance. The agency may require information and issue directions to service providers, intermediaries, data centres, body corporates and other persons. Failure to comply attracts imprisonment, fine, or both, and cognizance requires a complaint by an authorised officer.