Section 148A reassessment proceedings require disclosure of the computation, relevant allegations and supporting material before an order is made under Section 148A(3). Treating all bank credits as undisclosed turnover without furnishing the computation, and relying on allegations concerning fund parking, expenses and unsecured loans that were absent from the notice, converts the process into a roving inquiry rather than one based on definite aspects. The Section 148A(3) order, prior approval and Section 148 notice were quashed and remitted for fresh consideration after disclosure of the relied-upon material and a reasonable opportunity to respond.

Reassessment proceedings under sections 148A(3) and 148 require the assessing officer to examine the taxpayer's explanation and supporting records before concluding that reassessment is warranted. Bank credits asserted to be disclosed capital transactions or other non-turnover receipts must be considered, including balance-sheet disclosures. Where those materials are not examined, and no clarification is sought regarding the absence of increased capital or unsecured loans, the conclusion lacks cogent reasons. The reassessment order and consequential notice were quashed, with reconsideration directed after examining the explanation and obtaining any necessary clarification.

Income-tax proceedings do not automatically authorise withholding an assessee's bank accounts. A bank acting solely on an intimation from the Income-tax Department must demonstrate that due process was followed and that a statutory provision or rule authorised the restraint. Where no such proceedings or legal authority were shown, the communication withholding the accounts was set aside and the accounts were directed to be restored as operational. The merits of the underlying income-tax proceedings remained open.

For AY 2020-21, the Multilateral Instrument could not be used, including through its purpose or spirit, to determine a permanent establishment under the India-UK DTAA; Article 5 applicable for that year controlled. Dependent-agent, fixed-place and service PE status required fact-specific examination of contracts and conduct, including order solicitation, negotiation, pricing, credit risk, contractual obligations and performance; an Indian associated enterprise alone was insufficient, and Revenue bore the burden of proof. If a PE is established, profit attribution requires a functions, assets and risks analysis; arm's-length remuneration does not itself resolve PE status, and ad hoc attribution based on prior years is impermissible. PE and a.....

Under-reporting penalty requires assessed income to exceed the income determined on processing the return. Where reassessment accepts the income declared in the original return without any addition or disallowance, no income variation exists to constitute under-reported income and the statutory conditions for penalty are not met. The penalty is therefore unsustainable, the appellate order sustaining it is set aside, and deletion of the penalty follows.

Ad hoc disallowance of business expenditure is unjustified where audited books are not rejected and the Assessing Officer identifies no bogus or unsupported expenditure, particularly when apparent discrepancies arise from incorrect expense nomenclature and revised records remain unchallenged. The business-expenditure disallowance was deleted. Cash-payment disallowance requires verification of whether payments exceeded the prescribed limit to a single recipient and whether business exigency or statutory exceptions apply, including exceptions concerning animal-husbandry produce. The cash-payment issue was remitted for verification and fresh computation without a merits determination.

For computing the ceiling on partners' remuneration under section 40(b), book profit comprises the commercial profits shown in the partnership firm's profit and loss account, rather than only income assessed under the head of business or profession. Interest on FDRs and KVPs included in that account forms part of book profit even where treated as income from other sources. Excluding such interest from book profit is contrary to law, and the resulting disallowance of partners' remuneration is deleted.

Renewal of registration for an educational society turns on whether its objects are charitable and its activities genuinely pursue those objects, not solely on fees charged or incidental surplus. Where educational objects and corresponding activities are undisputed and no surplus is diverted to non-charitable purposes, fee-based operations and surplus do not justify refusal of registration. Delay in filing a renewal application may be condoned where a separate explanation establishes sufficient cause. The delay was condoned and registration was directed to be granted in accordance with the renewal application.

Section 80GGC deduction for a political donation requires the contribution to be genuine; banking-channel payments and donation receipts alone do not establish genuineness. Where investigation material, bank trails, and a known layering arrangement show that a registered unrecognised political party was used to provide accommodation entries, tax authorities may look beyond documents and apply the test of human probabilities to determine the transaction's real nature. A purported donation found to be an accommodation entry is not eligible for deduction, and the claimed deduction is disallowed.

Where sales, turnover and income declared under section 44AD are accepted, maintenance of books of account is not mandatory. Absence of transportation or GST particulars in purchase bills does not, by itself, establish unexplained cash expenditure where the accepted presumptive income has not been disturbed. Cash payments in the trading activity cannot consequently be treated as unexplained expenditure under section 69C solely on those deficiencies, and the addition is not sustainable.

Seized electronic records found in a company's possession cannot, merely through rebuttable presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C, be treated as an individual manager's undisclosed income without independent proof of personal receipt, diversion, or beneficial enjoyment. The individual's substantive additions were therefore deleted. For the company, a worksheet showing unrecorded cash receipts and payments supported unaccounted cash movements but did not establish that all gross receipts were taxable income or fictitious expenditure. Without entity-wise attribution, identified fictitious claims, and evidence excluding cash circulation, only the unaccounted income element was estimated; substantive additions were confined to 25% of gross amounts.

Sanction for reassessment beyond three years under section 149(1)(b) required valid approval. The approval proforma placed the proceedings within the period exceeding three years but not exceeding ten years, while the approval was granted by the PCIT. Applying a materially similar High Court ruling, ITAT treated the approval as invalid, quashed the section 148A(d) order, section 148 notice and consequential assessment, and left the remaining grounds open as academic.

Revision under section 263 may apply where reassessment of alleged bogus purchases lacks requisite verification. Supplier non-response, failure to furnish requested confirmations, evidence of goods movement and transporter payments, and the Assessing Officer's failure to undertake follow-up inquiry indicate inadequate inquiry. Mere issuance of notices and receipt of partial material do not constitute an inquiry reaching a conclusion under Explanation 2(a). An unreasoned profit-rate estimate does not represent a legally sustainable plausible view or a concluded opinion protected by change-of-opinion principles, rendering the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue.

Tax deduction at source under section 194H requires the assessee to make a commission payment within a principal-agent relationship. Where a principal directly credits retailer incentives and deducts tax under the intermediary's PAN, the intermediary's recording of gross receipts and retailer shares for Form 26AS reconciliation does not establish receipt of that share as income or a separate payment from its own funds. Trade incentives or discounts in principal-to-principal transactions therefore do not attract the withholding obligation or consequential disallowance.

Disputed stamp-duty valuation for property purchased requires the Assessing Officer to obtain a Valuation Officer's determination of fair market value before sustaining an addition under section 56(2)(vii). The valuation issue requires fresh examination of a co-owner's valuation report, its applicability, and the taxpayer's objections, with an opportunity of hearing. Claimed agricultural income likewise requires reconsideration against evidence of landholding and agricultural activity. Both the property-valuation addition and the characterisation of agricultural income require fresh adjudication rather than determination on the existing record.

Locus standi prevents an erstwhile director from prosecuting an appeal on behalf of a struck-off company that did not represent itself before the assessing or first appellate authority. A pre-emptive assessment made to protect Revenue against statutory limitation is not invalid solely because the company is non-existing. The former director may challenge personal liability only in proceedings under section 179; accordingly, the appeal on the company's behalf was dismissed.

Revision for alleged lack of inquiry into depreciation on toll-collection and sea-link operation rights was unsupported where the assessment record contained notices, details of the intangible-asset investment, the concession agreement and the depreciation claim. CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 concerning expenditure incurred by a BOT road or highway developer did not apply to a non-developer concessionaire that acquired toll-collection, operation and maintenance rights. As the cost was deductible through either depreciation or amortisation, the difference concerned timing and caused no real prejudice to revenue. The revision was quashed and the original assessment restored.

Rent paid to a related party for corporate office premises was treated as allowable business expenditure because the premises were used for business. Consistency in income-tax assessments applied where the relevant facts matched the preceding year and no distinguishing material was produced. The earlier acceptance of the rent claim was followed, resulting in deletion of the rent disallowance and dismissal of the Revenue's appeals for the relevant assessment years.

Interest on time deposits paid by a co-operative bank to a non-member co-operative society falls within the second limb of the TDS exemption for payments to co-operative societies. Although the member-payment limb specifically excludes co-operative banks, that exclusion does not extend to the separate limb for payments to another co-operative society. The bank retains its legal character as a co-operative society for this purpose. Accordingly, no tax deduction at source is required, and TDS-default and consequential interest liabilities do not arise.

Electronic evidence in income-tax assessments is not automatically inadmissible for lack of an Evidence Act certificate or non-compliance with the Digital Evidence Investigation Manual, although authenticity and probative value require factual scrutiny. Search statements are relevant but require corroboration where credibly disputed; necessary cross-examination safeguards against additions based solely on untested admissions. Student-wise reconciliation and contemporaneous books may rebut alleged unaccounted institutional fees, while refundable caution deposits remain liabilities rather than income. Site-imprest payments through authorised agents may fall within Rule 6DD(k). Charitable application depends on purpose and end-use, not vendor .....