Advanced Search Options : ❯
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 24-9-2026
PTI
IRDAI's consultation proposals for insurance distribution contemplate lower Expenses of Management limits, tighter commission controls, and greater control over loan-linked insurance practices. The prospective framework concerns insurer and intermediary remuneration, distribution expenses, and bancassurance fee structures. Reported concerns centre on potential effects on insurer earnings, intermediary economics, and lending-linked distribution arrangements; the measures are not described as final operative obligations or enforcement action.
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 24-9-2026
PTI
Eligible customers may seek collateral-free personal loans within stated amount, tenure and interest-rate ranges. Loan amount, interest rate and tenure determine the EMI and total interest payable, while calculator results are estimates rather than final repayment obligations. Eligibility includes nationality, age, employment and credit-score conditions, but approval, final pricing and loan amount remain subject to lender assessment, document verification and applicable terms. Online applications require personal, financial and employment details and KYC verification.
Section 79A of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 79A authorises the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, to specify a Department, body or agency of the Central or State Government as an Examiner of Electronic Evidence for providing expert opinions before courts or other authorities. Electronic form evidence covers information of probative value stored or transmitted electronically, including computer evidence, digital audio and video, cell phones, and digital fax machines.
Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 79 grants intermediaries conditional safe-harbour protection for third-party information, data and communication links where their role is limited, they do not control transmission or content, and they observe due diligence and prescribed guidelines. Protection is unavailable where an intermediary participates in an unlawful act or, after actual knowledge or government notification, fails to expeditiously remove or disable access to unlawful material while preserving evidence.
Section 77B of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 77B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 overrides inconsistent criminal-procedure provisions by classifying offences according to their prescribed imprisonment term. Offences punishable with imprisonment of three years or more are cognizable, while offences punishable with imprisonment of three years are bailable. The provision consequently attaches both cognizability and bailability to the three-year threshold.
Section 77A of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Compounding of offences under the Information Technology Act, 2000 is available only for offences not punishable with life imprisonment or imprisonment exceeding three years. It is barred where a prior conviction attracts enhanced or different punishment, and for offences affecting socio-economic conditions or committed against a child below eighteen years or a woman. An accused may apply in the court where the trial is pending under the applicable criminal procedure.
Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
Dated:- 24-9-2026
Each company seeking to function as a Nidhi must file Form NDH-4 for declaration or updated Nidhi status and comply with the Companies Act, 2013 and applicable Nidhi Rules. Nidhi companies may accept deposits and grant loans only to members. Public investors should verify declared Nidhi status rather than rely on unusually high-return promises, agent representations, or informal assurances. Deposits with Nidhi companies are not insured by the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation, and recovery may be difficult where a company fails or fraud occurs.
Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Liability applies to any person, including an intermediary, who obtains access while providing services under a lawful contract and discloses material containing another person's personal information without consent or in breach of that contract, intending or knowing that wrongful loss or wrongful gain is likely, subject to contrary provisions of applicable law.
FEMA / RBI
Dated:- 24-9-2026
PTI
Banks retain full discretion to deploy liquidity mobilised through FCNR(B) deposits, based on their credit pipeline, lending proposals, liquidity outlook and asset-liability position. No sector-specific direction applies to use of these funds. FCNR(B) deposits are fixed-term foreign-currency deposits in which principal and interest are repayable in the same foreign currency, protecting non-resident depositors from direct rupee exchange-rate risk. Continued prudent credit appraisal and underwriting standards are expected.
Circular No. 42/2026 Dated:- 24-9-2026 Circular Dated:- 24-9-2026 Circular
Specified woven and knitted fabric tariff items under Chapters 52, 55 and 60 require mandatory additional qualifiers in electronic export declarations from 1 November 2026. Exporters must use the qualifier "CHR" and declare either "FR001 - Flame Retardant Fabric" or "FR009 - Other than Flame Retardant Fabric" while filing shipping bills in the Customs Automated System. The requirement distinguishes fabrics used in fire/flame-retardant textile products from other fabrics sharing the same tariff classifications and supports implementation of the Production Linked Incentive Scheme for Textiles.
Section 70B of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 70B establishes the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team as the national agency for cyber-security incident response. The agency may collect and disseminate cyber-incident information, issue alerts and guidance, take emergency measures, and coordinate incident-response activities. It may require information from and issue directions to service providers, intermediaries, data centres, body corporate entities and other persons. Non-compliance is punishable with imprisonment, fine, or both, and cognizance requires a complaint by an authorised officer.
Section 70A of the Information Technology Act, 2000
The Central Government may designate a Government organisation as the national nodal agency for Critical Information Infrastructure Protection by Official Gazette notification. The designated agency is responsible for protective measures, including related research and development, and must perform its functions and duties in the prescribed manner.
Section 69B of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 69B permits government authorisation for monitoring and collecting traffic data from computer resources to enhance cyber security and prevent intrusions or computer contaminants. Intermediaries, persons in charge, and computer-resource operators must provide technical assistance and facilities for online access when required by an authorised agency. Prescribed procedures and safeguards apply, and intentional or knowing non-compliance by an intermediary is punishable by imprisonment, fine, or both.
Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 69A permits written directions requiring a government agency or intermediary to block public access to information through a computer resource on specified sovereignty, security, foreign-relations, public-order, or cognizable-offence incitement grounds. Blocking is subject to prescribed procedures and safeguards. Intermediary non-compliance with a blocking direction may result in imprisonment and fine.
Section 67C of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Intermediaries must preserve and retain specified information for the prescribed duration and in the prescribed manner and format. Intentional or knowing contravention of these information preservation and retention obligations may attract a penalty extending to twenty-five lakh rupees.
Circular No. PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 72/2020 Dated:- 1-6-2020 Trade Notice Dated:- 1-6-2020 Trade Notice
The temporary arrangement permits an undertaking to be accepted in place of the bond otherwise required for customs clearance. The facility remains available until 15 June 2020, while the deadline for furnishing the proper bond is extended until 30 June 2020. All existing conditions governing this arrangement continue unchanged during the extension.
Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 67B criminalises electronic publication, transmission, creation, collection, access, promotion, exchange, distribution and recording of material depicting children in obscene, indecent or sexually explicit forms, as well as online grooming or facilitation of abuse. A child is a person below 18 years. First and repeat convictions carry escalating imprisonment and fines. Limited exclusions apply to electronic works proved to serve public good through science, literature, art, learning or other general concern, and to bona fide heritage or religious uses.
Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 67A criminalises publishing, transmitting, or causing publication or transmission in electronic form of material containing sexually explicit acts or conduct. A first conviction may attract imprisonment of up to five years and a fine of up to ten lakh rupees; second or subsequent convictions may attract imprisonment of up to seven years and a fine of up to ten lakh rupees.
Section 66F of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Cyber terrorism includes intentional computer interference aimed at threatening national unity, security or sovereignty, or striking terror, where it causes or is likely to cause serious harm, disruption of essential services, or adverse effects on critical information infrastructure. It also includes unauthorised access to restricted security-related information where its use may harm protected national interests or benefit a foreign nation or group. Commission or conspiracy is punishable with imprisonment that may extend to life imprisonment.
Unconditional writ withdrawal abandons the claim and bars fresh Article 226 litigation on the same cause of action.
Unconditional withdrawal of a writ petition constitutes abandonment of the claim and bars a subsequent writ petition on the same cause of action as a matter of public policy. Although the Code of Civil Procedure does not directly apply to proceedings under Article 226, its equitable principles may guide the High Court's jurisdiction. Withdrawal or dismissal of proceedings under Article 32 does not itself determine whether a fresh writ petition before the High Court is maintainable. The bar on a second Article 226 petition follows from abandonment and prevention of repetitive litigation, rather than direct application of Order XXIII Rule 1.