Advanced Search Options : ❯
Document-production offences require a valid specified production order; information-seeking notices alone cannot sustain omission proceedings.
Proceedings for omission to produce documents require an intentional failure by a person legally bound to produce a specified document or electronic record. A written production order must identify the document or thing required and specify the time and place for production. Notices seeking information about an individual's whereabouts, an unserved purported production notice lacking those particulars, and attendance notices that do not require document production do not disclose the necessary basis for an omission offence. On those facts, the proceedings were legally misconceived and unsustainable.
Circular No. 38/1/2017-Fin(R&C)(290)/27668 Dated:- 20-2-2025 Goa SGST Dated:- 20-2-2025 Goa SGST
State Goods and Services Tax paid on admission or entry for exhibition of the film 'CHHAAVA' in Goa from 21 February 2025 through 31 May 2025 is eligible for reimbursement by the State Government. Exhibitors must retain existing ticket prices and seating patterns, remit applicable CGST and SGST through GST returns, and not collect the SGST component from viewers. Tickets must carry the prescribed non-collection endorsement. Claims require proof of tax payment, ticket sales, non-collection of SGST and compliance with the reimbursement conditions.
Intentional non-compliance with service-tax summons requires a precise document demand and deliberate non-attendance to support criminal liability.
Service-tax summons may be issued by a Senior Intelligence Officer acting as Superintendent of Central Excise, because Central Excise summons powers apply to service-tax matters. Criminal liability for summons non-compliance, however, requires an intentional breach of a precise legal obligation. A general reference to documents, without identifying documents required for production, does not establish intentional non-production under the IPC. Intentional non-attendance is likewise not established where responses to summons, appearance before the investigating officer, and willingness to cooperate negate deliberate avoidance. Statutory authority to issue summons alone cannot sustain criminal process for unspecified document demands or unintentional non-appearance.
Circular No. Trade Notice No. 28/2026-27 Dated:- 16-9-2026 Trade Notice Dated:- 16-9-2026 Trade Noti...
PSICs must be generated and issued within two days of inspection, with system access confined to that period and uploading required from the inspection location or country. A one-time seven-day transitional relaxation permits recognised Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies to clear backlog certificates for inspections completed before 25 August 2026 where system restrictions prevented issuance. Other PSIA/PSIC requirements remain unchanged.
Notification No. S.O. 5082 (E) Dated:- 16-9-2026 Prevention of Money-Laundering
Judicial designation and territorial coverage under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002, for Himachal Pradesh are revised through substitution of the first entries in columns (3) and (4) against serial number 9. The entries identify the Additional Sessions Judge (CBI), Shimla, and cover Shimla, Kinnaur, Solan, and Sirmaur at Nahan. The change is confined to these judicial office and district coverage particulars.
Circular No. CST/26-22/2024-25/4876 Dated:- 19-2-2025 Goa SGST Dated:- 19-2-2025 Goa SGST
Online Form GST SPL-01 and SPL-02 applications are initially allocated through a round-robin system to officers with the Recovery Officer role, without regard to the applicant taxpayer's local jurisdiction. The State Admin must retrieve applications and reassign them to the Deputy Commissioner responsible for the relevant ward. The Deputy Commissioner, with the ward in-charge STO, must equitably allocate applications among available STOs and ASTOs, maintain allocation records, and monitor timely processing and disposal under applicable GST legal provisions and written administrative guidance.
Notification No. 51/2026 Dated:- 16-9-2026 Central Excise - Tariff
Central excise exemption table entry in column (4) against serial number 2 is substituted with "Nil" under the statutory exemption-making power. The revised entry takes effect on publication in the Official Gazette and further amends the principal central excise exemption framework issued on 26 March 2026, concerning miscellaneous central excise exemptions.
Circular No. CCT/26-4/2024-25/G/4351 Dated:- 13-1-2025 Goa SGST Dated:- 13-1-2025 Goa SGST
GST treatment of vouchers in Goa is to be implemented consistently with the central GST clarification addressing various issues concerning vouchers. The clarification applies mutatis mutandis under the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, with changes necessary for the State GST framework. It is intended to secure uniform implementation of voucher-related GST treatment, and implementation difficulties may be brought to the Commissioner of State Taxes.
Notification No. 50/2026 Dated:- 16-9-2026 Central Excise - Tariff
Central excise exemption entry at serial number 1 is amended by substituting the entry in column (4) with "Rs. 15 per litre". The substituted entry forms part of the table governing the applicable central excise exemption, and the amendment takes effect on its publication in the Official Gazette.
Notification No. 49/2026 Dated:- 16-9-2026 Central Excise - Tariff
Central excise exemption table entries in column (4) are amended: serial number 1 is substituted with "Rs. 0.5 per litre" and serial number 2 with "Rs. 20 per litre". Made under the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with the Finance Act, 2002, the substitutions take effect on publication in the Official Gazette and are confined to these specified per-litre entries.
Circular No. CCT/26-4/2024-25/G/4350 Dated:- 13-1-2025 Goa SGST Dated:- 13-1-2025 Goa SGST
To secure uniform implementation of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the Commissioner of State Taxes directs that the central clarification on place of supply of online services supplied to unregistered recipients apply mutatis mutandis. The central position is to be followed with necessary adaptations in administering the State GST framework, and implementation difficulties may be brought to the Commissioner's notice.
Customs, DGFT & SEZ
Dated:- 17-9-2026
APEDA and InD Events Dubai have entered into a memorandum of understanding to support India's participation as Official Partner Country at Gulfood 2027. The partnership is directed at increasing global visibility for India's agricultural and processed food products, connecting Indian exporters with international buyers, and expanding market-access and business-engagement opportunities. Participation will bring together exporters, farmer producer organisations, MSMEs, startups, commodity boards and government institutions through product showcases, curated business-to-business meetings, conferences and industry engagements.
By: - DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Faceless assessment orders completed under sections 143(3) and 144B remain subject to revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 because they are made in exercise of the Assessing Officer's functions assigned under Board directions. Where deduction claims are accepted without any enquiry, the assessment can be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. Material areas requiring verification included the Ind AS rent deduction against lease-liability cash outflow and the bad-debt deduction after adjustment against the provision for bad debts.
By: - Vivek Jalan
Inverted-duty refund eligibility under GST depends on accumulated input tax credit arising from inputs taxed at rates higher than the output supply. Identical principal input and output goods taxed at the same rate do not by themselves bar refund where higher-rated ancillary inputs are used in business. Packaging materials, labels, cartons and plastic containers may qualify as inputs when necessary for marketing or supplying finished goods. Claims should demonstrate the rate differential, business use of such inputs and resulting credit accumulation.
By: - Raj Jaggi
Vested appellate rights attach when adjudicatory proceedings commence. The substituted pre-deposit condition in Section 107(6), effective from 1 October 2025 for penalty-only orders, does not govern appeals arising from show cause notices issued before that date. The applicable appellate condition is the law in force when the lis begins, not the date of the adjudication order or appeal. A later order cannot impose a newly introduced pre-deposit requirement on an appeal arising from an already commenced proceeding.
By: - K Balasubramanian
Composite GST show cause notices spanning multiple financial years raise a jurisdictional and limitation-based challenge where liabilities for distinct assessment periods are consolidated into one demand proceeding. Annual returns, tax liabilities, due dates and statutory limitation periods operate separately for each financial year. Combining several years in one notice may merge separate due dates, limitation periods, factual grounds and compliance obligations, impairing the taxpayer's ability to provide a year-specific response.
By: - K Balasubramanian
Section 16(5) retrospectively permits registered persons to avail input tax credit for invoices or debit notes relating to financial years 2017-18 through 2020-21 where the return under section 39 was filed by 30 November 2021, notwithstanding the general time limit. The retrospective benefit is subject to a bar on refunds of tax already paid or credit already reversed. Reported High Court reasoning characterizes the provision as curative and requires verification of the GSTR-3B filing date when applying the eligibility condition.
By: - Pradeep Reddy Unnathi Partners
SVB and transfer pricing apply the arm's length principle to related-party imports but address opposite risks: customs examines whether import values are too low for duty purposes, while transfer pricing examines whether pricing shifts profit out of India. Customs valuation applies sequential methods and tests related-party influence on price, whereas transfer pricing uses the most defensible method. One-time SVB positions and annually refreshed transfer pricing documentation can diverge; inconsistencies across agreements, filings, SVB submissions, and customs declarations require periodic comparison and coordinated ownership.
Composition-scheme eligibility survives belated revised returns when finally determined taxable turnover remains below the prescribed threshold.
Composition-scheme taxation at 0.5% remains available where finally determined taxable turnover is below the prescribed threshold, notwithstanding belated revised returns. Once the department accepts turnover within that threshold, it cannot impose the higher non-composition rate without cogent evidence that turnover exceeded the limit. The time limit for revising returns is procedural and does not displace substantive eligibility where differential tax and interest have been paid. Denial of the composition rate solely because revised returns were delayed is invalid.
Inter-State sales turn on contractual linkage to goods movement, while branch transfers require proof under the CST Act.
Inter-State sale under section 3(a) of the CST Act depends on whether the sale contract occasions movement of goods across State boundaries. Branch or stock transfers are distinguished from inter-State sales, subject to the dealer's burden of proof under section 6A. The Time Bound Supply Scheme requires examination as a framework or as an offer capable of forming a contract, including whether the contractual arrangement is inextricably linked to movement of goods. Binding remand findings are also relevant.