Advanced Search Options : ❯
Section 50 personal-search safeguards require a genuine choice of independent officer; deficient compliance can support NDPS bail.
Section 50(1) of the NDPS Act requires a person facing a personal search to receive a genuine option of being searched before the nearest Magistrate or an independent Gazetted Officer. A Gazetted Officer who belongs to the investigating agency may not meet the independence requirement. Missing panch-witness signatures on the statutory notice may weaken prima facie proof that the required intimation was given. Such defects can render an alleged recovery suspect and, together with the absence of criminal antecedents, may create reasonable grounds supporting bail.
Airport customs areas as public places bring NDPS interceptions under Section 43, limiting procedural bail challenges for commercial cocaine recovery.
Airport customs and immigration areas retain the character of public places under the NDPS Act despite controlled access, so interceptions and searches there fall under Section 43 rather than Sections 41 and 42. Section 43 does not require prior recording of information or reasons of belief, preventing alleged non-compliance with Sections 41 and 42 from creating a prima facie basis for bail. Where medical and X-ray material and alleged capsule recovery support possession of commercial-quantity cocaine, the Section 37 bail threshold applies. Challenges to Customs Act search compliance require trial evidence, and parity does not arise where no narcotics were recovered from the co-accused.
-
Personal search under the NDPS Act-compliance with Section 50 Section 50 NDPS Act-option of search before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate - Use of expression "any Gazetted Officer" - Validity of a notice offered before personal search under Section 50 of the NDPS Act using the expression "any Gazetted Officer" instead of "nearest Gazetted Officer". - HELD THAT: - Section 50 is intended to make the person to be searched aware of the option of being searched before a third person, namely a Gazet... ... ...
-
Service tax on outbound Hajj tours by tour operator - Service tax liability on outbound Hajj tours organised by a tour operator for service recipients in India - HELD THAT: - The Tribunal accepted that the controversy stood settled by its earlier decision in the appellant's own case [2015 (7) TMI 1428 - CESTAT BANGALORE] and followed that decision and held that outbound Haj tour services are not taxable as Tour Operator services. [Paras 5] The appeal was allowed with consequential relief ... ... ...
-
Consideration of representation for provisional release of imported goods pending investigation - HELD THAT: - As the representation had not been considered, and its consideration on merits would cause no prejudice to the respondents, the Court required the competent customs authorities to decide it in accordance with law. The Court expressly declined to examine the merits of the request for provisional release. [Paras 4] The respondents were directed to pass final orders on the representatio... ... ...
-
Deductibility of employee welfare expenditure - Deductibility of business advances written off - Depreciation on non-compete rights as intangible assets - Allocation of indirect expenses to section 80IB undertakings - Allocation of foreign travel expenses to export-oriented section 80IB undertakings - Monetary limits for Revenue appeals Ad hoc disallowance of employee welfare expenditure - Ad hoc disallowance of recreational and staff welfare expenditure for AYs 2004-05 and 2005-06 - HELD THA... ... ...
-
Transitional limitation for reassessment notices under TOLA - Approval by specified authority for reassessment beyond three years Surviving limitation for reassessment notices under TOLA - Validity of reassessment notices for AYs 2013-14 to 2015-16 under the transitional limitation provisions - HELD THAT: - A notice originally issued within the TOLA-extended period and deemed to be a show-cause notice under the substituted reassessment regime could be followed by a fresh reassessment notice o... ... ...
-
Validity of Reassessment - period of limitation - claimed extension was based on a reference for exchange of information with Swiss authorities Validity of reassessment for assessment year 2007-08 where limitation was sought to be extended by a Swiss information-exchange reference - HELD THAT: - Fact in the instant case are identical to the facts in the case of Shri Praveen Sawhney [2023 (7) TMI 1139 - ITAT DELHI] as the protocol in relation to the exchange of information came into operation ... ... ...
-
Unexplained cash deposits in bank account - Redeployment of prior bank withdrawals - Addition for unexplained cash deposits in the assessee's bank account, where the source was claimed as inheritance, past savings and redeposit of earlier withdrawals HELD THAT: - The proximity between the withdrawal made in November and the deposit made in December rendered the explanation of redeposit plausible. However, the assessee neither substantiated the claimed past savings or inheritance for the i... ... ...
-
Deduction for delayed employees' provident fund/ESI contributions due to portal glitches HELD THAT: - The benefit of deduction in cases of delayed deposit caused by a portal failure is available where the assessee substantiates that the technical glitch prevented timely payment. As the assessee furnished no documentary evidence beyond a bare assertion of a technical glitch, the factual foundation for the claim required verification. As in the case of Kangra Co-operative Bank Ltd.[2025 ... ... ...
-
Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer - Jurisdiction of the Income Tax Officer, Delhi, to assess an assessee residing and carrying on business in Aizwal, Mizoram, in respect of cash deposits in an Aizwal bank account HELD THAT: - The assessee's residence, proprietary business and bank account in which the alleged cash deposits were made were all situated at Aizwal, Mizoram. The Revenue placed no material showing how the Income Tax Officer, Delhi, had assumed jurisdiction over the assessee. Th... ... ...
-
Tax credits u/s 143(1) intimation - Co-terminus appellate powers Grant of TDS, TCS, advance-tax and self-assessment-tax credits in processing intimation on the documents furnished in first appeal - HELD THAT: - The first appellate authority had examined the documents supporting the tax-credit claims and found the claimed credits proper. The Tribunal held that the first appellate authority, having co-terminus powers, could either call for a report or remand the matter to the Assessing Officer,... ... ...
-
Unexplained investment in fixed assets - Deduction u/s 80C for life insurance premium and tuition fees Unexplained investment in fixed assets - Audited balance sheet - Addition for alleged unexplained investment in fixed assets disclosed in the audited balance sheet - HELD THAT: - The entire investment stood recorded in the audited balance sheet, from which the Assessing Officer had itself drawn the figure. A balance sheet reflects both the assets and their corresponding sources; therefore, a... ... ...
-
Penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars - bona fide claim of revenue expenditure during project setup Levy of penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars on disallowance of expenditure claimed as revenue expenditure during the setting up of a thermal power plant - HELD THAT: - The assessee had disclosed complete particulars of the expenditure in its financial statements and return, and the expenditure was not found to be non-genuine. Having itself treated substantial expenditure as ca... ... ...
-
Exemption u/s 11 denied - return was not filed within the due date under Section 139(1) read with Section 139(4A) - Prospective operation of section 12A(1)(ba) Entitlement to exemption for a charitable trust for AY 2017-18 despite filing the return after the due date and in response to reassessment notice - HELD THAT: - The condition requiring filing of the return within the due date prescribed under section 139(1) for claiming charitable exemption was introduced by insertion of section 12A(1... ... ...
-
Limitation for electronically issued reassessment notice - Revision of non est reassessment order - Collateral challenge to assessment jurisdiction Electronic issuance of reassessment notice - Limitation for reassessment notice - Validity of a reassessment notice electronically transmitted after expiry of the statutory limitation period. - HELD THAT: - Electronic delivery of a reassessment notice is complete when the electronic record is sent to the assessee's registered electronic addres... ... ...
-
Admission of additional evidence in income-tax appeals - Substance over form Rejection of additional evidence tendered to explain an addition for unexplained cash deposits merely because Rule 46A was not expressly invoked - HELD THAT: - The addition arose from the assessee's non-compliance before the Assessing Officer, while the appellate authority rejected the additional evidence solely for non-reference to Rule 46A. Since substance prevails over form, such non-mention could not constitu... ... ...
-
Unexplained cash receipts reflected in an impounded diary -Presumption for documents impounded from a partner's premises -Unexplained investment in land based on an uncorroborated agreement to sale - Unexplained cash contribution by a partner to a firm - Disallowance of purchases not claimed as deduction - Unexplained investment in gold jewellery - De minimis plea for unexplained cash receipt Unexplained cash receipts in an impounded diary - Presumption for impounded documents - Addition ... ... ...
-
Limitation for reassessment notice under TOLA - Revision for failure to enquire into alleged on-money payment Limitation for reassessment notice under TOLA - Validity of revision founded on a reassessment initiated by a notice under section 148 issued after expiry of the surviving period under TOLA - HELD THAT: - Under the amended reopening provisions, only the surviving statutory period remained available for issuance of the notice under section 148. The notice having been issued after expir... ... ...
-
Reassessment beyond three years on group cash-transaction data - Mechanical sanction for reassessment notice - Second reassessment notice on unchanged material Reassessment beyond three years on group cash-transaction data - Validity of reassessment notices issued after the normal limitation period on the basis of group cash receipts and payments recorded in a separately searched laptop - HELD THAT: - The extended period under section 149(1)(b) was available only where the material possessed ... ... ...