Advanced Search Options : ❯
Section 16 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 16 empowers the Central Government to prescribe security procedures and practices for secure electronic records and secure electronic signatures. The prescription must take account of commercial circumstances, the nature of transactions, and other related factors considered appropriate when determining applicable procedures and practices.
Section 15 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Secure electronic signature status arises where signature-creation data is under the exclusive control of the signatory when the signature is affixed, and is stored and affixed in the prescribed exclusively controlled manner. For a digital signature, signature-creation data means the subscriber's private key.
Section 14 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Secure electronic record status attaches where a security procedure is applied to an electronic record at a specific point in time. The record is deemed secure from that point until verification, defining the temporal period during which the secure-record classification operates. The classification is linked to application of the security procedure and its continuation until verification.
Section 13 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Despatch occurs when an electronic record enters a computer resource outside the originator's control. Where the addressee has designated a computer resource, receipt occurs on entry into that resource; where the record is sent to another computer resource of the addressee, receipt occurs upon retrieval. Electronic records are deemed dispatched at the originator's place of business and received at the addressee's place of business, irrespective of the physical location of the computer resource.
Section 12 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Where the originator makes receipt of acknowledgment a condition for the electronic record to be binding, failure to receive acknowledgment results in the record being deemed never sent. Where no such condition is stipulated, the originator may, after non-receipt within the applicable period, notify the addressee and prescribe a reasonable further period. If acknowledgment remains outstanding, the originator may treat the electronic record as never sent.
Section 11 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Attribution of an electronic record to its originator arises where the originator personally sends it, where it is sent by a person authorised to act for the originator in relation to that record, or where an information system programmed by or for the originator automatically transmits it.
Section 10 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Central Government rulemaking power for electronic signatures permits prescription of the types of electronic signature, the manner and format in which they are affixed, and procedures facilitating identification of the person affixing an electronic signature. Rulemaking may also establish processes ensuring the integrity, security and confidentiality of electronic records or payments, and address matters necessary to give legal effect to electronic signatures.
Section 9 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 9 limits electronic governance provisions by clarifying that sections 6, 7 and 8 create no enforceable right to compel a government ministry, department, statutory authority, or government-controlled or funded body to accept, issue, create, retain, or preserve documents as electronic records, or to conduct monetary transactions electronically. Electronic acceptance cannot be demanded by an individual.
Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Electronic Gazette publication satisfies a legal requirement for publication in the Official Gazette. Rules, regulations, orders, bye-laws, notifications and other matters may be published in either the Official Gazette or the Electronic Gazette. The deemed publication date is the date of the Gazette first published in any form.
Section 7 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Electronic retention satisfies a statutory retention requirement where information remains accessible for subsequent reference, is preserved in its original or accurately reproducible format, and includes details identifying its origin, destination, and despatch or receipt timing. Automatically generated transmission information is excluded from the identification-details requirement. The framework does not apply where a law expressly provides for retention in electronic-record form.
Section 6 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Statutory requirements for filing documents with government offices or agencies, obtaining licences, permits, sanctions or approvals, and receiving or paying money may be satisfied through electronic forms prescribed by the appropriate Government. Rules may govern the manner and format for filing, creating or issuing electronic records, and the method for payment of related fees or charges.
Section 5 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Legal recognition of electronic signatures applies where a law requires authentication by signature or requires a document to be signed or bear a person's signature. Such requirements are satisfied when authentication is effected through an electronic signature affixed in the manner prescribed by the Central Government.
Section 4 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Legal recognition of electronic records under Section 4 applies where any law requires information or another matter in writing, typewritten or printed form. Such a requirement is deemed satisfied, notwithstanding anything inconsistent in that law, if the information or matter is rendered or made available in electronic form and is accessible so as to be usable for subsequent reference purposes.
Section 3 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Authentication of electronic records may be undertaken by a subscriber by affixing a digital signature through an asymmetric cryptographic system and hash function. The hash function produces a consistent hash result for the same electronic record and must make reconstruction of the original record or generation of identical results for different records computationally infeasible. Verification may be performed using the subscriber's public key, which, together with the unique private key, forms a functioning key pair.
GST liability of airport duty-free shops and the airport authority's refund mechanism remain under consideration.
GST liability of airport duty-free shops and the mechanism for refunding GST paid by an airport authority to the Department require clarification in light of a Supreme Court decision concerning non-imposition of indirect tax on such shops. Assistance and instructions have been sought on these issues, which remain listed for further hearing.
Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 2 defines the legal framework for electronic records, computer resources, electronic authentication and cyber security. Digital and electronic signatures are authenticated through prescribed techniques, including asymmetric cryptography using private and public keys. Certifying Authorities issue Electronic Signature Certificates to subscribers and verification confirms both valid signature creation and record integrity. Intermediaries include entities that receive, store, transmit or provide services concerning electronic records. Cyber security and secure systems require protection against unauthorised activity, reliability, functional suitability and accepted security procedures.
Section 1 of the Information Technology Act, 2000
Legal recognition of electronic transactions, electronic data interchange and electronic communications enables alternatives to paper-based information storage and facilitates electronic filing with government agencies. Application extends throughout India and, unless otherwise provided, covers offences and contraventions committed outside India by any person. Specified documents and transactions in the First Schedule are excluded, while additions or deletions to that Schedule may be made through Official Gazette notification subject to parliamentary laying.
Circular No. PUBLIC NOTICE No. 126 / 2026 Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Notice Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Not...
Inter-CFS movement of LCL export cargo from authorised originating CFSs to Allcargo Terminals Ltd. CFS is permitted after grant of a Let Export Order, with cargo moved in Customs-sealed containers for consolidation or assimilation and subsequent export. Each Shipping Bill must move in full; stuffing, sealing, document transfer, gate-out, unloading, de-stuffing, re-stuffing and final removal require Customs supervision, seal verification, endorsements and bond debits. Destination operations require tally records, shipment within 30 days, periodic reporting, safe custody and segregation of cargo. Custodians remain liable for losses, unlawful substitution and non-compliance.
Roasted areca nut classification: high-temperature processing places whole, split, and cut nuts under the specific roasted-nuts tariff entry.
Roasted areca nuts, whether whole, split or cut, fall under tariff item 2008 19 20 as other roasted nuts and seeds. Chapter 20 covers nuts otherwise prepared or preserved, whereas Chapter 8 is confined to drying, dehydration and moderate heat treatment. Repeated high-temperature roasting and cooling produces changes distinct from the processes permitted for Chapter 8 products. HSN Explanatory Notes expressly include dry-roasted, oil-roasted and fat-roasted areca or betel nuts under heading 2008. The specific tariff entry for roasted nuts prevails over the general entry for dried nuts, without recourse to common parlance.
Circular No. PUBLIC NOTICE No. 113/2026 Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Notice Dated:- 21-9-2026 Trade Notic...
Customs EDI procedures require Customs officers to draw samples when an online AQCS request is made for a Bill of Entry marked for a No Objection Certificate. The system displays a sampling prompt during examination and Out-of-Charge, and prevents clearance unless the requested sample is drawn. Officers must generate and electronically transmit the test memo, dispatch the physical sample with a test memo copy, and access the digitally integrated test report through NOC details.