Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Penalty under Section 129(3) for alleged diversion of goods requires reliable evidence that the actual movement or delivery contravened GST law, even where valid invoices and e-way bills accompany the consignment. Vehicle proximity to another factory, discrepancies in a transport bilty, and the driver's statement do not, without corroboration, establish delivery to an undeclared recipient where the goods' description and quantity match the accompanying documents. Failure to provide GPS-camera footage relied on adversely may deny a fair opportunity to contest the allegation. The penalty orders were set aside and the penalty quashed.
Penalty under Section 129(3) for alleged diversion of goods requires reliable evidence that the actual movement or delivery contravened GST law, even where valid invoices and e-way bills accompany the consignment. Vehicle proximity to another factory, discrepancies in a transport bilty, and the driver's statement do not, without corroboration, establish delivery to an undeclared recipient where the goods' description and quantity match the accompanying documents. Failure to provide GPS-camera footage relied on adversely may deny a fair opportunity to contest the allegation. The penalty orders were set aside and the penalty quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
