Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Cash deposits claimed to arise from cash sales require...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cash deposits claimed to arise from cash sales require documentary verification linking the sales to the specific deposits. Matching aggregate turnover with VAT returns and establishing a cash-sales business do not alone prove that nexus; cash books, sales and stock registers, and date-wise or period-wise reconciliation must establish cash availability and rule out circulation through multiple accounts. Verification of the claimed source was remitted to the Assessing Officer with reasonable opportunity. A reassessment notice allowing less than seven days in its stated response date remained valid where the order followed only after twelve days and no inability or attempt to respond was shown; the cross-objection failed.
Cash deposits claimed to arise from cash sales require documentary verification linking the sales to the specific deposits. Matching aggregate turnover with VAT returns and establishing a cash-sales business do not alone prove that nexus; cash books, sales and stock registers, and date-wise or period-wise reconciliation must establish cash availability and rule out circulation through multiple accounts. Verification of the claimed source was remitted to the Assessing Officer with reasonable opportunity. A reassessment notice allowing less than seven days in its stated response date remained valid where the order followed only after twelve days and no inability or attempt to respond was shown; the cross-objection failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.