Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271D was time-barred because section 275(1)(c) required the penalty order to be passed within six months from the end of the month in which the penalty notice was issued. The notice was issued in January 2021, making July 2021 the statutory deadline; the March 2022 order fell outside that period. The penalty order was therefore invalid and quashed, and the appellate order was set aside.
Penalty under section 271D was time-barred because section 275(1)(c) required the penalty order to be passed within six months from the end of the month in which the penalty notice was issued. The notice was issued in January 2021, making July 2021 the statutory deadline; the March 2022 order fell outside that period. The penalty order was therefore invalid and quashed, and the appellate order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
