Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
SEZ units may seek refund of eligible unutilised input tax credit distributed through an Input Service Distributor where the credit is attributable to their own zero-rated exports without payment of integrated tax. The supplier-specific procedure for direct SEZ supplies does not automatically bar such claims. Refund eligibility remains subject to verification, statutory conditions and quantification. A proposed exclusion for alleged prior supplier refund requires cogent documentary evidence, disclosure to the claimant and a reasonable opportunity to respond; supplier applications or unexplained back-office records alone do not establish double refund.
SEZ units may seek refund of eligible unutilised input tax credit distributed through an Input Service Distributor where the credit is attributable to their own zero-rated exports without payment of integrated tax. The supplier-specific procedure for direct SEZ supplies does not automatically bar such claims. Refund eligibility remains subject to verification, statutory conditions and quantification. A proposed exclusion for alleged prior supplier refund requires cogent documentary evidence, disclosure to the claimant and a reasonable opportunity to respond; supplier applications or unexplained back-office records alone do not establish double refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
