Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Section 129(3) requires a detention penalty order to be passed within seven days of service of the notice issued after detention. Penalty orders concerning vehicles carrying scrap, made after that mandatory period, were barred by limitation and without jurisdiction. Pending proceedings concerning the supplier's registration did not suspend the statutory period because no competent court had stayed the detention proceedings. The availability of a statutory appeal did not preclude writ jurisdiction against jurisdictionally invalid orders. The time-barred orders were quashed, the detained vehicles were directed to be released without payment of alleged duty, and otherwise permissible proceedings against the supplier or recipient remained unaffected.
Section 129(3) requires a detention penalty order to be passed within seven days of service of the notice issued after detention. Penalty orders concerning vehicles carrying scrap, made after that mandatory period, were barred by limitation and without jurisdiction. Pending proceedings concerning the supplier's registration did not suspend the statutory period because no competent court had stayed the detention proceedings. The availability of a statutory appeal did not preclude writ jurisdiction against jurisdictionally invalid orders. The time-barred orders were quashed, the detained vehicles were directed to be released without payment of alleged duty, and otherwise permissible proceedings against the supplier or recipient remained unaffected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4913 
