Constitutional personal-liberty safeguards limit PMLA twin bail conditions where completed investigations lead to prolonged incarceration before trial...
Automated airline software subscriptions without human intervention fail technical-services characterisation and do not make available underlying tech...
Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
Page of 4912
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98239 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 260A(7) imports CPC appellate procedure into High Court income-tax appeals to the extent compatible with Section 260A. Because such appeals resemble second appeals and Order XLII applies Order XLI to them, Order XLI Rule 22 can permit cross-objections despite no express provision in Section 260A. A cross-objection remains limited to the adverse part of the Tribunal's order and must raise a substantial question of law. It cannot expand jurisdiction to factual issues or matters outside that order. Maintainability therefore depends on satisfying the statutory substantial-question-of-law requirement.
Section 260A(7) imports CPC appellate procedure into High Court income-tax appeals to the extent compatible with Section 260A. Because such appeals resemble second appeals and Order XLII applies Order XLI to them, Order XLI Rule 22 can permit cross-objections despite no express provision in Section 260A. A cross-objection remains limited to the adverse part of the Tribunal's order and must raise a substantial question of law. It cannot expand jurisdiction to factual issues or matters outside that order. Maintainability therefore depends on satisfying the statutory substantial-question-of-law requirement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.