Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Agricultural-land reinvestment qualifies when transfer consideration precedes replacement purchase, while unexamined claims may be reassessed on escap...
Bona fide public fixed-deposit explanations prevent concealment penalties where unexplained-credit additions lack independent evidence of undisclosed ...
Factory-consumption condition restricts solar module parts exemption and excludes imported aluminium profiles fabricated outside the production factor...
Page of 4910
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98196 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Extended reassessment beyond six years from a search requires...
Extended reassessment limitation in search cases requires asset-linked escaped income, invalidating additions based only on unexplained money or expenditure.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Extended reassessment beyond six years from a search requires material showing that escaped income is represented in the form of an asset. Additions for unexplained money and unexplained expenditure cannot support the extended period where they are not founded on an asset discovered during the search; a statement recorded during search does not, by itself, satisfy that statutory condition. On that basis, the reopening was invalid, the additions remained deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The assessee's cross-objection was infructuous.
Extended reassessment beyond six years from a search requires material showing that escaped income is represented in the form of an asset. Additions for unexplained money and unexplained expenditure cannot support the extended period where they are not founded on an asset discovered during the search; a statement recorded during search does not, by itself, satisfy that statutory condition. On that basis, the reopening was invalid, the additions remained deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The assessee's cross-objection was infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.