Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Rejection of a declared customs transaction value requires...
Customs transaction value rejection requires communicated reasonable doubt, while written reassessment acceptance preserves challenges to enhanced valuation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Rejection of a declared customs transaction value requires recorded and communicated reasonable doubt and cannot rest solely on acceptance letters or uncorroborated contemporaneous-import data. Comparable-import valuation must establish relevant comparability factors, including quality, quantity, GSM and timing. Written acceptance of reassessment can dispense with a speaking order but does not waive the importer's statutory right to challenge the formation of opinion or the reassessment on merits. Enhanced valuation based only on acceptance letters and unsupported import data therefore lacks a lawful basis, and the importer may contest it despite written acceptance.
Rejection of a declared customs transaction value requires recorded and communicated reasonable doubt and cannot rest solely on acceptance letters or uncorroborated contemporaneous-import data. Comparable-import valuation must establish relevant comparability factors, including quality, quantity, GSM and timing. Written acceptance of reassessment can dispense with a speaking order but does not waive the importer's statutory right to challenge the formation of opinion or the reassessment on merits. Enhanced valuation based only on acceptance letters and unsupported import data therefore lacks a lawful basis, and the importer may contest it despite written acceptance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
