Withdrawal directions permitting an appellant to seek a court-deposited amount "subject to entitlement" must be read by reference to the party designations in the relevant civil appeal. The appellant in the Supreme Court appeal was therefore eligible to apply for release of the deposit, while the corporate debtor, as respondent and depositor, was not. The corporate debtor's withdrawal request was rejected, and the fixed-deposit amount was directed to be remitted to the appellant.
Withdrawal directions permitting an appellant to seek a court-deposited amount "subject to entitlement" must be read by reference to the party designations in the relevant civil appeal. The appellant in the Supreme Court appeal was therefore eligible to apply for release of the deposit, while the corporate debtor, as respondent and depositor, was not. The corporate debtor's withdrawal request was rejected, and the fixed-deposit amount was directed to be remitted to the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4910 
