Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
GST exemptions for sub-contracted manpower supply under Serial Nos. 3 and 3A require the supply to be made directly to a specified Government recipient. Supply to a private principal contractor does not meet that condition merely because the contractor executes a State water-supply project or the ultimate beneficiary is governmental. The recipient requirement applies independently; characterisation as a pure service connected with a constitutional function or as a qualifying composite supply cannot cure its absence. The claimed exemptions were denied, the advance ruling was upheld, and the supply remained taxable under the applicable classification and rate provisions.
GST exemptions for sub-contracted manpower supply under Serial Nos. 3 and 3A require the supply to be made directly to a specified Government recipient. Supply to a private principal contractor does not meet that condition merely because the contractor executes a State water-supply project or the ultimate beneficiary is governmental. The recipient requirement applies independently; characterisation as a pure service connected with a constitutional function or as a qualifying composite supply cannot cure its absence. The claimed exemptions were denied, the advance ruling was upheld, and the supply remained taxable under the applicable classification and rate provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
