Income Declaration Scheme declarations can evidence share-capital sources, while round-tripped funds and cash-linked credits require further verificat...
Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
GST exemptions for sub-contracted manpower supply under Serial Nos. 3 and 3A require the supply to be made directly to a specified Government recipient. Supply to a private principal contractor does not meet that condition merely because the contractor executes a State water-supply project or the ultimate beneficiary is governmental. The recipient requirement applies independently; characterisation as a pure service connected with a constitutional function or as a qualifying composite supply cannot cure its absence. The claimed exemptions were denied, the advance ruling was upheld, and the supply remained taxable under the applicable classification and rate provisions.
GST exemptions for sub-contracted manpower supply under Serial Nos. 3 and 3A require the supply to be made directly to a specified Government recipient. Supply to a private principal contractor does not meet that condition merely because the contractor executes a State water-supply project or the ultimate beneficiary is governmental. The recipient requirement applies independently; characterisation as a pure service connected with a constitutional function or as a qualifying composite supply cannot cure its absence. The claimed exemptions were denied, the advance ruling was upheld, and the supply remained taxable under the applicable classification and rate provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
