Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Rule 10B does not prescribe a lower or upper turnover limit for transfer-pricing comparables in the software development services segment. Market conditions, assets employed and risks assumed remain material to comparability analysis. An upper turnover filter may therefore be applied where it rationally distinguishes companies with materially different scale and economic profiles. Its application is a factual determination and is not open to interference unless perversity is pleaded and demonstrated. The Tribunal's use of the filter consequently raised no substantial question of law, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Rule 10B does not prescribe a lower or upper turnover limit for transfer-pricing comparables in the software development services segment. Market conditions, assets employed and risks assumed remain material to comparability analysis. An upper turnover filter may therefore be applied where it rationally distinguishes companies with materially different scale and economic profiles. Its application is a factual determination and is not open to interference unless perversity is pleaded and demonstrated. The Tribunal's use of the filter consequently raised no substantial question of law, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.