Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Agricultural-land reinvestment qualifies when transfer consideration precedes replacement purchase, while unexamined claims may be reassessed on escap...
Bona fide public fixed-deposit explanations prevent concealment penalties where unexplained-credit additions lack independent evidence of undisclosed ...
Factory-consumption condition restricts solar module parts exemption and excludes imported aluminium profiles fabricated outside the production factor...
Page of 4910
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98196 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Faceless reassessment under the e-Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 requires automated allocation for notices and all connected reassessment proceedings. Pre-notice enquiry and orders are inseparable from notice issuance and reassessment; concurrent-jurisdiction notifications cannot preserve a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer's authority where automated allocation was not used. Proceedings initiated under sections 148A and 148 by such officers were therefore set aside. Retrospective validating legislation must cure the statutory defect underlying prior judicial decisions and cannot merely override them; section 147A was unconstitutional because it left section 151A and the Scheme unchanged. Its insertion after repeal of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was also unsustainable, since specified commencement and saving provisions did not authorise amendment of a repealed enactment.
Faceless reassessment under the e-Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 requires automated allocation for notices and all connected reassessment proceedings. Pre-notice enquiry and orders are inseparable from notice issuance and reassessment; concurrent-jurisdiction notifications cannot preserve a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer's authority where automated allocation was not used. Proceedings initiated under sections 148A and 148 by such officers were therefore set aside. Retrospective validating legislation must cure the statutory defect underlying prior judicial decisions and cannot merely override them; section 147A was unconstitutional because it left section 151A and the Scheme unchanged. Its insertion after repeal of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was also unsustainable, since specified commencement and saving provisions did not authorise amendment of a repealed enactment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4910 
