Cross-segment derivatives manipulation: integrated order patterns can support interim restraints, while director liability requires responsibility, co...
Power bank definition limits the customs-duty exclusion, preserving concessional treatment for stationary, grid-scale and industrial battery storage s...
Packing-material input credits support inverted-duty refunds for packaged tea, while rate-reduction and concessional-supply circulars remain inapplica...
Page of 4908
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 98141 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Management fees earned through a Cairo hotel permanent...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted allocation method.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Management fees earned through a Cairo hotel permanent establishment were treated as business profits taxable in UAR and therefore exempt in India under the India-UAR DTAA, with inclusion permitted only for rate purposes. Consistent acceptance of the exemption in earlier and later years supported deletion of the related addition. Indirect common expenditure attributable to exempt dividends remained disallowable only to the extent computed under the consistently accepted income-distribution methodology. For MAT purposes, provision for wealth tax was not an adjustment to book profit because the applicable adjustment covers only income-tax. Reversal of provision for diminution in investment value also did not warrant a book-profit adjustment where the provision had already been added back when created.
Management fees earned through a Cairo hotel permanent establishment were treated as business profits taxable in UAR and therefore exempt in India under the India-UAR DTAA, with inclusion permitted only for rate purposes. Consistent acceptance of the exemption in earlier and later years supported deletion of the related addition. Indirect common expenditure attributable to exempt dividends remained disallowable only to the extent computed under the consistently accepted income-distribution methodology. For MAT purposes, provision for wealth tax was not an adjustment to book profit because the applicable adjustment covers only income-tax. Reversal of provision for diminution in investment value also did not warrant a book-profit adjustment where the provision had already been added back when created.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.