Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Page of 4910
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 98196 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Pre-arrest bail was considered unavailable for alleged misappropriation of funds entrusted for GST payments and alleged use of fabricated GST payment documents. Substantial sums received for GST payment were allegedly not deposited through the GST portal, while forged forms were allegedly produced to create a false appearance of payment. The seriousness of the alleged conduct, involving entrusted funds and fabricated GST records, was treated as sufficient to deny anticipatory protection.
Pre-arrest bail was considered unavailable for alleged misappropriation of funds entrusted for GST payments and alleged use of fabricated GST payment documents. Substantial sums received for GST payment were allegedly not deposited through the GST portal, while forged forms were allegedly produced to create a false appearance of payment. The seriousness of the alleged conduct, involving entrusted funds and fabricated GST records, was treated as sufficient to deny anticipatory protection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.