TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Palmolein classification defeated the crude-oil concession; material misdeclaration sustained recovery and confiscation, while separate false-document...
Section 127 transfers for centralised assessment require...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes require statutory appeal.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 127 transfers for centralised assessment require recorded and communicated reasons, and transfers between officers subordinate to different Commissioners require the prescribed inter-Commissioner agreement; an opportunity of hearing depends on feasibility. Taxpayers who requested centralisation, filed returns, responded to notices and participated before the transferee officer were treated as having acquiesced in the transferred jurisdiction, preventing a later technical challenge to the transfer. Challenges to consequential assessment orders were not entertained in writ jurisdiction where an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The writ petitions challenging the transfers and assessments were dismissed.
Section 127 transfers for centralised assessment require recorded and communicated reasons, and transfers between officers subordinate to different Commissioners require the prescribed inter-Commissioner agreement; an opportunity of hearing depends on feasibility. Taxpayers who requested centralisation, filed returns, responded to notices and participated before the transferee officer were treated as having acquiesced in the transferred jurisdiction, preventing a later technical challenge to the transfer. Challenges to consequential assessment orders were not entertained in writ jurisdiction where an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The writ petitions challenging the transfers and assessments were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
