Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
Automotive radio classification treats integrated infotainment features as supplementary, placing complete and qualifying unassembled units under the ...
Separate corporate personality prevents directors from being personally liable for company deposits without a guarantee or independent legal undertaki...
Section 43B disallowance of interest liability converted into...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference shares.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 43B disallowance of interest liability converted into preference shares under a corporate debt restructuring arrangement was deleted. A High Court judgment affirming the relevant Tribunal approach retained its precedential value despite the Revenue's pending Special Leave Petition. Mere pendency of a challenge before the Supreme Court does not displace that judgment unless it is stayed, reversed, or modified. The Tribunal therefore sustained deletion of the disallowance and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Section 43B disallowance of interest liability converted into preference shares under a corporate debt restructuring arrangement was deleted. A High Court judgment affirming the relevant Tribunal approach retained its precedential value despite the Revenue's pending Special Leave Petition. Mere pendency of a challenge before the Supreme Court does not displace that judgment unless it is stayed, reversed, or modified. The Tribunal therefore sustained deletion of the disallowance and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4908 
