Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Agricultural-land reinvestment qualifies when transfer consideration precedes replacement purchase, while unexamined claims may be reassessed on escap...
Bona fide public fixed-deposit explanations prevent concealment penalties where unexplained-credit additions lack independent evidence of undisclosed ...
Omission of GST Rule 96(10) without a saving clause or statutory mechanism preserving earlier action prevents pending proceedings under the omitted rule from continuing. Applying the Supreme Court principle in Good Luck India Limited, proceedings founded on Rule 96(10) were vitiated following its omission. The impugned orders were set aside, while respondents remained free to take appropriate measures as permitted by law.
Omission of GST Rule 96(10) without a saving clause or statutory mechanism preserving earlier action prevents pending proceedings under the omitted rule from continuing. Applying the Supreme Court principle in Good Luck India Limited, proceedings founded on Rule 96(10) were vitiated following its omission. The impugned orders were set aside, while respondents remained free to take appropriate measures as permitted by law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.