Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Agricultural-land reinvestment qualifies when transfer consideration precedes replacement purchase, while unexamined claims may be reassessed on escap...
Bona fide public fixed-deposit explanations prevent concealment penalties where unexplained-credit additions lack independent evidence of undisclosed ...
Section 80GGC deduction depends on proving that a payment to a political party was a genuine contribution. Payment through banking channels and the recipient's registration are relevant but not conclusive. Genuineness may be assessed through the test of human probabilities, including evidence that the donee issued false receipts or returned donations, inconsistencies in the claim, incomplete bank records, failure to provide requested information, and non-response to enquiries. On such cumulative material, a deduction may be disallowed without relying solely on third-party statements. A challenge limited to the initiation of penalty proceedings is premature.
Section 80GGC deduction depends on proving that a payment to a political party was a genuine contribution. Payment through banking channels and the recipient's registration are relevant but not conclusive. Genuineness may be assessed through the test of human probabilities, including evidence that the donee issued false receipts or returned donations, inconsistencies in the claim, incomplete bank records, failure to provide requested information, and non-response to enquiries. On such cumulative material, a deduction may be disallowed without relying solely on third-party statements. A challenge limited to the initiation of penalty proceedings is premature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.