Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Page of 4907
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The safe-harbour tolerance-band proviso to section 56(2)(x)(b) addresses unintended hardship where purchase consideration and stamp-duty value differ only marginally. Its remedial and clarificatory character supports application from the provision's original operation, including Assessment Year 2018-19, rather than only prospectively. As the proviso is pari materia with related stamp-duty valuation provisions, a variation within the statutory tolerance margin does not sustain a deeming addition. The marginal valuation difference therefore did not justify addition as deemed income.
The safe-harbour tolerance-band proviso to section 56(2)(x)(b) addresses unintended hardship where purchase consideration and stamp-duty value differ only marginally. Its remedial and clarificatory character supports application from the provision's original operation, including Assessment Year 2018-19, rather than only prospectively. As the proviso is pari materia with related stamp-duty valuation provisions, a variation within the statutory tolerance margin does not sustain a deeming addition. The marginal valuation difference therefore did not justify addition as deemed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.