GST offence classification determines whether arrest and bail restrictions apply, while continued custody requires an individualised necessity assessm...
Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Page of 4921
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 98414 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Timely payment under section 28(6)(i) statutorily concludes all matters stated in a customs show-cause notice, except proceedings expressly preserved. On that reading, proceedings concerning provisionally released imported goods cannot continue selectively for confiscation, redemption fine or penalty under section 114A after statutory conclusion. Redemption fine requires a valid confiscation order, while the proviso to section 125 regulates an existing confiscation power and cannot revive a power already brought to an end. Precedent concerning provisionally released goods does not determine the consequence of statutory conclusion under section 28(6)(i).
Timely payment under section 28(6)(i) statutorily concludes all matters stated in a customs show-cause notice, except proceedings expressly preserved. On that reading, proceedings concerning provisionally released imported goods cannot continue selectively for confiscation, redemption fine or penalty under section 114A after statutory conclusion. Redemption fine requires a valid confiscation order, while the proviso to section 125 regulates an existing confiscation power and cannot revive a power already brought to an end. Precedent concerning provisionally released goods does not determine the consequence of statutory conclusion under section 28(6)(i).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4921 
