Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Page of 4913
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 98250 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Statutory outer limits on condoning delay restrict the First Appellate Authority's jurisdiction in GST registration-cancellation appeals; equitable considerations and fact-specific constitutional orders cannot extend that power. However, where the Department has already restored registrations pursuant to the challenged appellate orders, its challenge may become infructuous because reversing those orders without addressing the consequences of implementation offers no effective relief. Failure or inability to seek revocation through Rule 23, including where the common portal blocks a late application, does not extinguish the independent statutory right to appeal cancellation of GST registration.
Statutory outer limits on condoning delay restrict the First Appellate Authority's jurisdiction in GST registration-cancellation appeals; equitable considerations and fact-specific constitutional orders cannot extend that power. However, where the Department has already restored registrations pursuant to the challenged appellate orders, its challenge may become infructuous because reversing those orders without addressing the consequences of implementation offers no effective relief. Failure or inability to seek revocation through Rule 23, including where the common portal blocks a late application, does not extinguish the independent statutory right to appeal cancellation of GST registration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.