Clubbing of income from gifted property failed where the claim surfaced after reassessment limitation, sustaining capital-gains assessment in spouse's...
Employee stock-option discount qualifies as revenue expenditure, while royalty and service comparables require reliable functional and transactional b...
Statutory outer limits on condoning delay restrict the First Appellate Authority's jurisdiction in GST registration-cancellation appeals; equitable considerations and fact-specific constitutional orders cannot extend that power. However, where the Department has already restored registrations pursuant to the challenged appellate orders, its challenge may become infructuous because reversing those orders without addressing the consequences of implementation offers no effective relief. Failure or inability to seek revocation through Rule 23, including where the common portal blocks a late application, does not extinguish the independent statutory right to appeal cancellation of GST registration.
Statutory outer limits on condoning delay restrict the First Appellate Authority's jurisdiction in GST registration-cancellation appeals; equitable considerations and fact-specific constitutional orders cannot extend that power. However, where the Department has already restored registrations pursuant to the challenged appellate orders, its challenge may become infructuous because reversing those orders without addressing the consequences of implementation offers no effective relief. Failure or inability to seek revocation through Rule 23, including where the common portal blocks a late application, does not extinguish the independent statutory right to appeal cancellation of GST registration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4912 
